{
  "_description": "Generated from data/ — edit the sources, not this file. The agent access guide explains the evidence boundary of every field.",
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
  "kind": "entry",
  "locale": "en",
  "id": "inclusive-design",
  "name": {
    "zh": "包容性设计",
    "en": "Inclusive Design"
  },
  "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/inclusive-design/",
  "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/inclusive-design.json",
  "alternates": {
    "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/inclusive-design.json",
    "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/inclusive-design.json"
  },
  "site": {
    "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0",
    "entries": 158,
    "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/index.json",
    "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=en",
    "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/agents/",
    "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt"
  },
  "provenance": {
    "sourceBacked": [
      "entry.definition"
    ],
    "editorial": [
      "entry.boundary",
      "entry.signature",
      "entry.when",
      "entry.when_not",
      "entry.tradeoff",
      "entry.comparison",
      "entry.rules",
      "entry.relations",
      "entry.implementationNote",
      "entry.philosophy"
    ],
    "scope": "Definitions reference these sources. Digital specimens, selection advice, relationships, and recipes are editorial work and have not been validated through user research.",
    "editorialStatus": "sample-reviewed",
    "specimenData": "fictional",
    "specimenNote": "Original fictional specimens. Definitions cite sources; usage advice and recipes are editorial.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "microsoft-inclusive",
        "url": "https://inclusive.microsoft.design/",
        "title": "Microsoft · Inclusive Design",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "status": "available",
          "confirmed": true,
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915165359/https://inclusive.microsoft.design/",
          "capturedAt": "2026-09-15T16:53:59Z",
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://inclusive.microsoft.design/"
        }
      }
    ],
    "lists": [
      {
        "id": "H-C",
        "edition": "classic",
        "seat": 2,
        "origin": "editorial-reconstruction",
        "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-C/",
        "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-C.json"
      }
    ],
    "ordered": false,
    "listDisclaimer": "Seat numbers are editorial positions, not scores, rankings, or popularity measurements. A list that is not filled is left as it is."
  },
  "entry": {
    "id": "inclusive-design",
    "type": "philosophy",
    "name": {
      "zh": "包容性设计",
      "en": "Inclusive Design"
    },
    "aliases": [
      "包容设计"
    ],
    "granularity": "experience",
    "intents": [
      "include-users",
      "reduce-exclusion"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "diversity",
      "differences in ability",
      "temporary constraints",
      "participation",
      "accessibility"
    ],
    "definition": "Actively recognize exclusion, learn from human diversity, and extend solutions for specific constraints to benefit more people.",
    "boundary": "This is not a few accessibility switches added before delivery. Different people need to participate in understanding, design, and validation.",
    "signature": [
      "Recognizing mismatches between people and environments",
      "Offering different ways to achieve a goal",
      "Involving affected people in validation"
    ],
    "when": [
      "Defining intended users and core tasks",
      "Permanent, temporary, or situational constraints affect use"
    ],
    "when_not": [
      "Claiming a product includes everyone based on one specimen",
      "Treating one person's preferences as everyone's needs"
    ],
    "tradeoff": "It requires contact with real people and contexts; component checks cannot replace participatory validation.",
    "comparison": {
      "focus": "Who can participate and achieve the goal",
      "mechanism": "Recognizing exclusion, learning from diversity, and extending solutions",
      "cost": "Requires participation from diverse people"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "microsoft-inclusive",
        "title": "Microsoft · Inclusive Design",
        "url": "https://inclusive.microsoft.design/",
        "claim": "The method emphasizes recognizing exclusion, learning from diversity, and solving for one while extending to many.",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://inclusive.microsoft.design/",
          "status": "available",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-15T16:52:31.168Z",
          "jobId": "spn2-332d4dfe0ac0ccd46a65e0083dc1d0e80ef177d5",
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915165359/https://inclusive.microsoft.design/",
          "timestamp": "20260915165359"
        }
      }
    ],
    "relations": [
      {
        "target": "calm-technology",
        "kind": "composes_with",
        "condition": "Designing status notifications",
        "reason": "Consider attention and different ways of perceiving information together.",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "recognition",
        "kind": "realized_by",
        "condition": "Reducing reliance on memory",
        "reason": "Visible, readable options are one concrete strategy.",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "rules": [
      {
        "when": "Only automated checks have been completed",
        "instruction": "Do not claim every person's experience has been validated.",
        "strength": "must",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "when": "Designing a new input or feedback method",
        "instruction": "Consider alternative ways to operate it and involve affected people in validation.",
        "strength": "recommend",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "philosophy": {
      "values": [
        "Participation",
        "Diversity",
        "Recognizing exclusion"
      ],
      "tension": "Shared solutions versus individual differences",
      "questions": [
        "Who would this default interaction exclude?",
        "Could the same goal be achieved another way?"
      ]
    },
    "demo": "inclusive-design",
    "version": "0.1.0",
    "editorialStatus": "sample-reviewed",
    "requirements": [],
    "demoCapabilities": [
      "keyboard",
      "reduced_motion"
    ],
    "implementationNote": "Capability tags describe this specimen only; verify the implementation again in a real product.",
    "searchTerms": [
      "多样性",
      "能力差异",
      "临时限制",
      "参与",
      "无障碍"
    ]
  }
}