{ "_description": "Generated from data/ — edit the sources, not this file. The agent access guide explains the evidence boundary of every field.", "schemaVersion": "1.0.0", "kind": "list", "locale": "en", "id": "H-C", "name": { "zh": "理念与哲学 · 经典基础", "en": "Ideas & philosophies · Classic foundation" }, "headline": { "zh": "设计理念 Top 10：10 大经典设计哲学与方法论", "en": "Top 10 Classic Design Philosophies and Methodologies" }, "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-C/", "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-C.json", "alternates": { "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/H-C.json", "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-C.json" }, "site": { "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0", "entries": 158, "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/index.json", "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=en", "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/agents/", "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt" }, "provenance": { "selection": "editorial", "ordered": false, "disclaimer": "Seat numbers are editorial positions, not scores, rankings, or popularity measurements. A list that is not filled is left as it is.", "titleNote": "“Top” in the title is a search convention. This edition is an editorial selection, not a ranking, a score, or a measure of popularity.", "seatOrigins": { "issue-1-ledger": "The seat comes from the list ledger in plan issue #1.", "editorial-reconstruction": "The seat was filled by editorial judgement in this repository." }, "evidence": "There is no ordering among these positions. Each reason says which distinct question the entry raises; none argues that one is more correct.", "nominalSize": 10, "seatCount": 10, "filled": true, "sibling": { "id": "H-Y", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-Y/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-Y.json" } }, "seats": [ { "seat": 1, "entry": "calm-technology", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "Sets the category's baseline: how technology spends a person's attention.", "name": "Calm Technology", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/calm-technology/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/calm-technology.json" }, { "seat": 2, "entry": "inclusive-design", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "Covers starting from exclusion, emphasising difference rather than an average user.", "name": "Inclusive Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/inclusive-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/inclusive-design.json" }, { "seat": 3, "entry": "human-centered-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers placing people and their context at the centre of the process.", "name": "Human-Centered Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/human-centered-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/human-centered-design.json" }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "universal-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers the methodology aiming at the widest possible range of people — a different emphasis from inclusive design.", "name": "Universal Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/universal-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/universal-design.json" }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "participatory-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers those affected taking part in decisions, rather than only being studied.", "name": "Participatory Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/participatory-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/participatory-design.json" }, { "seat": 6, "entry": "privacy-by-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers privacy as the default way a system runs, not something added afterwards.", "name": "Privacy by Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/privacy-by-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/privacy-by-design.json" }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "sustainable-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers long-term resource use, which is not the same concern as reducing interruption.", "name": "Sustainable Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/sustainable-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/sustainable-design.json" }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "value-sensitive-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers systematically examining human values throughout the process; not a synonym for inclusive design.", "name": "Value Sensitive Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/value-sensitive-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/value-sensitive-design.json" }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "progressive-enhancement", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers the engineering stance of building up from the most basic capability; unrelated to revealing information on demand.", "name": "Progressive Enhancement", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/progressive-enhancement/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/progressive-enhancement.json" }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "systems-thinking", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers seeing a product as part of a larger system, which explains why local optimisation can backfire.", "name": "Systems Thinking", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/systems-thinking/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/systems-thinking.json" } ], "list": { "id": "H-C", "category": "philosophy", "edition": "classic", "name": { "zh": "理念与哲学 · 经典基础", "en": "Ideas & philosophies · Classic foundation" }, "headline": { "zh": "设计理念 Top 10：10 大经典设计哲学与方法论", "en": "Top 10 Classic Design Philosophies and Methodologies" }, "note": "A classic foundation for ideas and philosophies: these positions can hold at the same time, and none scores higher overall.", "keywords": [ "design philosophies", "design methodology", "human-centered design", "inclusive design", "universal design", "privacy by design", "sustainable design", "participatory design" ], "lead": "This edition collects design positions that can hold at the same time. They are not mutually exclusive: a project can be participatory, privacy-first, and mindful of long-term resource use all at once.", "criteria": [ "A verifiable source states what the position claims and how it is practised, rather than a slogan.", "It changes how work is done — who takes part, what comes first, what the default is — not just how it is described.", "Its emphasis differs from its neighbours; it is not a synonym." ], "pairing": "This edition overlaps almost entirely with the 2026 focus edition. That means these positions are still being discussed; it does not mean they gained popularity in 2026.", "evidence": "There is no ordering among these positions. Each reason says which distinct question the entry raises; none argues that one is more correct.", "seats": [ { "seat": 1, "entry": "calm-technology", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "Sets the category's baseline: how technology spends a person's attention." }, { "seat": 2, "entry": "inclusive-design", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "Covers starting from exclusion, emphasising difference rather than an average user." }, { "seat": 3, "entry": "human-centered-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers placing people and their context at the centre of the process." }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "universal-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers the methodology aiming at the widest possible range of people — a different emphasis from inclusive design." }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "participatory-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers those affected taking part in decisions, rather than only being studied." }, { "seat": 6, "entry": "privacy-by-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers privacy as the default way a system runs, not something added afterwards." }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "sustainable-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers long-term resource use, which is not the same concern as reducing interruption." }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "value-sensitive-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers systematically examining human values throughout the process; not a synonym for inclusive design." }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "progressive-enhancement", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers the engineering stance of building up from the most basic capability; unrelated to revealing information on demand." }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "systems-thinking", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers seeing a product as part of a larger system, which explains why local optimisation can backfire." } ] } }