{ "_description": "Generated from data/ — edit the sources, not this file. The agent access guide explains the evidence boundary of every field.", "schemaVersion": "1.0.0", "kind": "list", "locale": "en", "id": "H-Y", "name": { "zh": "理念与哲学 · 2026 关注", "en": "Ideas & philosophies · 2026 focus" }, "headline": { "zh": "2026 设计理念趋势：八大值得关注的设计哲学", "en": "2026 Trending Design Philosophies: Top 8 Design Ideas in 2026" }, "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-Y/", "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-Y.json", "alternates": { "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/H-Y.json", "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-Y.json" }, "site": { "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0", "entries": 158, "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/index.json", "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=en", "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/agents/", "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt" }, "provenance": { "selection": "editorial", "ordered": false, "disclaimer": "Seat numbers are editorial positions, not scores, rankings, or popularity measurements. A list that is not filled is left as it is.", "titleNote": "“Trending” and “Top” in the title are search conventions. This edition records the discussion it was following — not adoption, popularity, or any ranking.", "seatOrigins": { "issue-1-ledger": "The seat comes from the list ledger in plan issue #1.", "editorial-reconstruction": "The seat was filled by editorial judgement in this repository." }, "evidence": "A specification draft is not a recommendation, and institutional guidance represents its publisher's position. Both show that discussion exists, not that practice has changed.", "nominalSize": 10, "seatCount": 8, "filled": false, "sibling": { "id": "H-C", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-C/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/H-C.json" } }, "seats": [ { "seat": 3, "entry": "human-centered-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Asked again in the annual context: when a system acts on its own, whose context stays at the centre.", "name": "Human-Centered Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/human-centered-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/human-centered-design.json" }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "universal-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it asks whether new interface shapes still reach the widest range of people.", "name": "Universal Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/universal-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/universal-design.json" }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "participatory-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it asks whether those affected took part in designing automated decisions.", "name": "Participatory Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/participatory-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/participatory-design.json" }, { "seat": 6, "entry": "privacy-by-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it carries the constraint of not collecting and not sending on by default.", "name": "Privacy by Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/privacy-by-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/privacy-by-design.json" }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "sustainable-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it addresses a marked rise in computation and transfer cost.", "name": "Sustainable Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/sustainable-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/sustainable-design.json" }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "value-sensitive-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it supplies a way to put value conflicts on the table rather than defend them afterwards.", "name": "Value Sensitive Design", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/value-sensitive-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/value-sensitive-design.json" }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "progressive-enhancement", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it corresponds to core content staying reachable when a feature is unavailable.", "name": "Progressive Enhancement", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/progressive-enhancement/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/progressive-enhancement.json" }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "systems-thinking", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it explains why a single change produces consequences at a larger scale.", "name": "Systems Thinking", "type": "philosophy", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/systems-thinking/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/systems-thinking.json" } ], "list": { "id": "H-Y", "category": "philosophy", "edition": "2026-focus", "name": { "zh": "理念与哲学 · 2026 关注", "en": "Ideas & philosophies · 2026 focus" }, "headline": { "zh": "2026 设计理念趋势：八大值得关注的设计哲学", "en": "2026 Trending Design Philosophies: Top 8 Design Ideas in 2026" }, "note": "Design ideas this edition follows in 2026; the overlap with the classic list means these positions are still being discussed, not that attention to them has grown.", "keywords": [ "2026 design philosophy trends", "trending design ideas 2026", "design ethics", "value sensitive design", "participatory design", "progressive enhancement", "systems thinking" ], "lead": "This edition records the design ideas this edition was following in 2026. It overlaps almost entirely with the classic foundation edition — an honest outcome rather than an unfinished list: these positions were still being discussed in 2026, and no new, verifiably grounded position displaced them.", "criteria": [ "A verifiable specification draft, institutional guidance, or methodological literature discussed it around 2026.", "It offers a concrete way of handling a current problem rather than restating a value.", "A new term with no grounding is not admitted merely to make the edition look fresh." ], "pairing": "The heavy overlap with the classic foundation edition is itself this edition's finding: positions change far more slowly than visual or interaction practice.", "evidence": "A specification draft is not a recommendation, and institutional guidance represents its publisher's position. Both show that discussion exists, not that practice has changed.", "seats": [ { "seat": 3, "entry": "human-centered-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Asked again in the annual context: when a system acts on its own, whose context stays at the centre." }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "universal-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it asks whether new interface shapes still reach the widest range of people." }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "participatory-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it asks whether those affected took part in designing automated decisions." }, { "seat": 6, "entry": "privacy-by-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it carries the constraint of not collecting and not sending on by default." }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "sustainable-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it addresses a marked rise in computation and transfer cost." }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "value-sensitive-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it supplies a way to put value conflicts on the table rather than defend them afterwards." }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "progressive-enhancement", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it corresponds to core content staying reachable when a feature is unavailable." }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "systems-thinking", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it explains why a single change produces consequences at a larger scale." } ] } }