{ "_description": "Generated from data/ — edit the sources, not this file. The agent access guide explains the evidence boundary of every field.", "schemaVersion": "1.0.0", "kind": "list", "locale": "en", "id": "I-Y", "name": { "zh": "交互模式 · 2026 关注", "en": "Interaction patterns · 2026 focus" }, "headline": { "zh": "2026 交互趋势：七大值得关注的人机协作交互模式", "en": "2026 Trending Interactions: Top 7 Interaction Patterns in 2026" }, "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/I-Y/", "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/I-Y.json", "alternates": { "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/I-Y.json", "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/I-Y.json" }, "site": { "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0", "entries": 158, "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/index.json", "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=en", "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/agents/", "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt" }, "provenance": { "selection": "editorial", "ordered": false, "disclaimer": "Seat numbers are editorial positions, not scores, rankings, or popularity measurements. A list that is not filled is left as it is.", "titleNote": "“Trending” and “Top” in the title are search conventions. This edition records the discussion it was following — not adoption, popularity, or any ranking.", "seatOrigins": { "issue-1-ledger": "The seat comes from the list ledger in plan issue #1.", "editorial-reconstruction": "The seat was filled by editorial judgement in this repository." }, "evidence": "Vendor design guidance shows an arrangement is recommended, not that it has become convention; preprint studies have not been peer reviewed. Neither is evidence of adoption.", "nominalSize": 10, "seatCount": 7, "filled": false, "sibling": { "id": "I-C", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/I-C/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/I-C.json" } }, "seats": [ { "seat": 3, "entry": "conversational-interface", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Where 2026 discussion concentrated: stating an intent in place of operating visible controls.", "name": "Conversational Interface", "type": "interaction", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/conversational-interface/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/conversational-interface.json" }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "human-approval", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers the checkpoint where a system stops and asks before doing something consequential, kept separate from autonomy as a philosophical position.", "name": "Human Approval Checkpoint", "type": "interaction", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/human-approval/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/human-approval.json" }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "undo-redo", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Carries more weight in the annual context: changes made automatically also need to be reversible.", "name": "Undo and Redo", "type": "interaction", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/undo-redo/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/undo-redo.json" }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "source-inspection", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers checking the grounding of one specific claim — a narrower goal than disclosure in general.", "name": "Source Inspection", "type": "interaction", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/source-inspection/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/source-inspection.json" }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "contextual-actions", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it is how an action gets bound back to one specific passage of generated content.", "name": "Contextual Actions", "type": "interaction", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/contextual-actions/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/contextual-actions.json" }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "command-palette", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Appears in the annual context as the keyboard counterpart to a natural-language entrance; annual evidence for it is thin.", "name": "Command Palette", "type": "interaction", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/command-palette/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/command-palette.json" }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "batch-actions", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it corresponds to handling batches of automatic results at once; annual evidence for it is thin.", "name": "Batch Actions", "type": "interaction", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/batch-actions/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/batch-actions.json" } ], "list": { "id": "I-Y", "category": "interaction", "edition": "2026-focus", "name": { "zh": "交互模式 · 2026 关注", "en": "Interaction patterns · 2026 focus" }, "headline": { "zh": "2026 交互趋势：七大值得关注的人机协作交互模式", "en": "2026 Trending Interactions: Top 7 Interaction Patterns in 2026" }, "note": "Interaction questions this edition follows in 2026, mainly about people working with automated systems; its size follows the discussion that could be verified.", "keywords": [ "2026 interaction trends", "trending interaction patterns 2026", "AI interface design", "conversational interface", "human approval checkpoint", "source inspection" ], "lead": "This edition records the interaction questions this edition was following in 2026, gathered around people working with automated systems: what the system is doing, when it should stop and ask, and how a person checks what it produced.", "criteria": [ "Verifiable guidelines, product design documentation, or experimental research discussed it around 2026.", "It describes an interaction arrangement, not a model capability.", "Positions without verifiable discussion stay empty; this edition is therefore not full." ], "pairing": "Against the classic foundation edition, this one assumes a system that initiates actions. An entry in both lists is an older pattern now used to constrain new behaviour.", "evidence": "Vendor design guidance shows an arrangement is recommended, not that it has become convention; preprint studies have not been peer reviewed. Neither is evidence of adoption.", "seats": [ { "seat": 3, "entry": "conversational-interface", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Where 2026 discussion concentrated: stating an intent in place of operating visible controls." }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "human-approval", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers the checkpoint where a system stops and asks before doing something consequential, kept separate from autonomy as a philosophical position." }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "undo-redo", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Carries more weight in the annual context: changes made automatically also need to be reversible." }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "source-inspection", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Covers checking the grounding of one specific claim — a narrower goal than disclosure in general." }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "contextual-actions", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it is how an action gets bound back to one specific passage of generated content." }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "command-palette", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "Appears in the annual context as the keyboard counterpart to a natural-language entrance; annual evidence for it is thin." }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "batch-actions", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "In the annual context it corresponds to handling batches of automatic results at once; annual evidence for it is thin." } ] } }