{
  "_description": "本文件由 data/ 生成：请改动来源文件，不要改这里。各字段的证据边界见接入指南。",
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
  "kind": "entry",
  "locale": "zh-CN",
  "id": "craftsmanship",
  "name": {
    "zh": "匠艺",
    "en": "Craftsmanship"
  },
  "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/craftsmanship/",
  "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/craftsmanship.json",
  "alternates": {
    "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/craftsmanship.json",
    "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/craftsmanship.json"
  },
  "site": {
    "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0",
    "entries": 137,
    "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/index.json",
    "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=zh",
    "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/agents/",
    "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt"
  },
  "provenance": {
    "sourceBacked": [
      "entry.definition"
    ],
    "editorial": [
      "entry.boundary",
      "entry.signature",
      "entry.when",
      "entry.when_not",
      "entry.tradeoff",
      "entry.comparison",
      "entry.rules",
      "entry.relations",
      "entry.implementationNote",
      "entry.philosophy"
    ],
    "scope": "定义参考以上来源；数字界面示例、选择建议、条件关系及配方由本样例编辑，尚未经用户研究验证。",
    "editorialStatus": "drafted",
    "specimenData": "fictional",
    "specimenNote": "示例为原创虚构界面；定义附来源，用法与配方为编辑建议。",
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "craftsmanship-sennett",
        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Craftsman_(book)",
        "title": "Wikipedia · The Craftsman (book)",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "status": "pending",
          "confirmed": false,
          "url": null,
          "capturedAt": null,
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Craftsman_(book)"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "craftsmanship-workmanship",
        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workmanship",
        "title": "Wikipedia · Workmanship",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "status": "pending",
          "confirmed": false,
          "url": null,
          "capturedAt": null,
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workmanship"
        }
      }
    ],
    "lists": [],
    "ordered": false,
    "listDisclaimer": "席位号是编辑位置，不是评分、排名或人气统计；清单未收满时保持原样，不补足。"
  },
  "entry": {
    "id": "craftsmanship",
    "type": "philosophy",
    "name": {
      "zh": "匠艺",
      "en": "Craftsmanship"
    },
    "aliases": [
      "Craft",
      "Workmanship",
      "手艺",
      "工艺精神"
    ],
    "granularity": "experience",
    "intents": [
      "assess-impact",
      "understand-users"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "技艺",
      "打磨",
      "质量",
      "过程",
      "长期"
    ],
    "definition": "一种以\"把事情本身做好\"为目的的工作态度：判断标准来自手艺内部的质量尺度，而不是来自外部奖励；因此它关心过程中的技艺与判断，而不只是交付物是否通过了验收。",
    "boundary": "匠艺是关于\"以什么为目的做事\"的立场，不是一套可验收的质量指标，也不等于打磨细节：把动画调到完美却让核心流程不可用，不是匠艺而是错置的注意力。它也不是\"慢\"的同义词——追求做好与按期交付并不天然冲突，但两者确实会争夺同一份时间，这正是它最需要被谈清楚的地方。本词条不把它当作可以压倒其他考虑的价值：以匠艺之名拒绝妥协、延迟交付或贬低他人的工作，同样是对这一立场的误用。",
    "signature": [
      "质量标准来自做这件事本身，而不是来自考核或奖励",
      "过程中的判断被记录下来，使后来者知道为什么这样做",
      "愿意为把一处做对而重做，而不是绕过它"
    ],
    "when": [
      "产物会被长期维护，早期的粗糙会持续产生代价",
      "团队需要一套关于\"什么算做好了\"的共同理解",
      "工作的质量在外部难以观察，只能靠内部标准维持"
    ],
    "when_not": [
      "用它为无限期的打磨辩护，交付本身被无限推迟",
      "注意力落在无人关心的细节上，核心问题仍未解决",
      "以匠艺之名贬低他人的工作或拒绝必要的取舍"
    ],
    "tradeoff": "以内部标准要求自己能在无人监督处保住质量，也让经验得以积累；代价是这份标准与交付压力争夺同一份时间，而且它是自我设定的——没有外部校准时，它同样可能把力气用在无人受益的地方。",
    "comparison": {
      "focus": "以把事情本身做好为目的来组织工作",
      "mechanism": "采用来自手艺内部的质量尺度并记录过程中的判断",
      "cost": "与交付压力争夺时间，且标准缺乏外部校准"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "craftsmanship-sennett",
        "title": "Wikipedia · The Craftsman (book)",
        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Craftsman_(book)",
        "claim": "该条目记载 Richard Sennett 于 2008 年出版的《The Craftsman》讨论匠艺及其对个人与社会的重要性，并概括其核心主张：匠艺的精神在于\"为把一件事做好而做好它\"的意愿；书中还认为纯粹被物质回报或竞争驱动的人，通常不如被这种意愿驱动的人做出好作品。本词条的定义据此转述。",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Craftsman_(book)",
          "status": "pending",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-22T11:57:48.995Z",
          "error": "status-request-failed",
          "jobId": "spn2-423387b1881f30fb0b17c9597d0d1338d79cae23"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "craftsmanship-workmanship",
        "title": "Wikipedia · Workmanship",
        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workmanship",
        "claim": "该条目把 workmanship 定义为与完成某项任务的知识与技能相关的人类属性，同时也是赋予产品的一种品质；文中说明 workmanship 与 craftsmanship 有时被视为同义，但许多人在两者之间作出区分，或至少认为 craftsmanship 意指\"更好的那一类 workmanship\"，并记录 David Pye 认为无人能确切指出 workmanship 在哪里结束、craftsmanship 从哪里开始。该条目的参考文献记录了 Pye 1968 年著作第二章的标题为 \"The workmanship of risk and the workmanship of certainty\"；本词条只据此指出这一区分存在，不转述其具体内容。",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workmanship",
          "status": "pending",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-16T17:41:07.847Z",
          "error": "status-request-failed",
          "jobId": "spn2-286326004561362d7befcc8c63938b7bcc2e8883"
        }
      }
    ],
    "relations": [
      {
        "target": "systems-thinking",
        "kind": "composes_with",
        "condition": "需要判断把力气花在哪一处才真正改善整体",
        "reason": "匠艺提供做好的意愿，系统思考提供\"哪里做好才有用\"的判断；缺了后者，前者容易落在无人受益的细节上。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "sustainable-design",
        "kind": "composes_with",
        "condition": "产物会被长期使用与维护",
        "reason": "把一件东西做得经得起长期维护，本身就减少了重做与替换带来的资源消耗。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "human-centered-design",
        "kind": "conflicts_when",
        "condition": "内部的质量标准与用户实际遇到的问题不一致",
        "reason": "匠艺的尺度来自手艺内部，可能与用户的需要无关；两者不一致时应以后者为准，并据此重新校准前者。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "participatory-design",
        "kind": "related",
        "condition": "质量标准需要外部校准",
        "reason": "自我设定的标准缺乏外部参照，把使用者纳入判断是校准它的一种具体方式。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "rules": [
      {
        "when": "以质量为由推迟交付",
        "instruction": "说明具体推迟的是哪一处、为什么它现在就必须做对，而不是笼统地以\"还不够好\"为由。",
        "strength": "must",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "when": "团队宣称重视匠艺",
        "instruction": "把\"什么算做好了\"写成具体、可被他人检查的标准，并定期用真实使用情况校准它。",
        "strength": "recommend",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "philosophy": {
      "values": [
        "把事情本身做好，而不是只满足验收",
        "技艺与判断值得被积累和传授"
      ],
      "tension": "内部的质量标准与外部的交付压力、用户实际需要之间",
      "questions": [
        "这一处做好了，谁会因此受益？",
        "我们说的\"做好\"，是谁的标准？",
        "现在不做对，代价会由谁在什么时候承担？"
      ]
    },
    "demo": null,
    "version": "0.1.0",
    "editorialStatus": "drafted",
    "requirements": [],
    "demoCapabilities": [],
    "implementationNote": "本词条尚无可操作示例；插画为编辑示意，以反复打磨同一个构件来表现这一立场，不代表任何具体的工作方法。应用到团队之前仍须把\"什么算做好了\"写成他人可检查的标准。",
    "image": {
      "src": "/images/craftsmanship.webp",
      "alt": "一张示意图：同一个虚构界面版面横向排成五次迭代，从手绘般歪斜的草稿逐步变得规整——线条拉直、间距对齐、层级分明，每一次之间用一个小箭头连接，最后一次旁边立着一把尺。"
    },
    "searchTerms": [
      "skill",
      "refinement",
      "quality",
      "process",
      "long term"
    ]
  }
}