{
  "_description": "本文件由 data/ 生成：请改动来源文件，不要改这里。各字段的证据边界见接入指南。",
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
  "kind": "entry",
  "locale": "zh-CN",
  "id": "false-urgency",
  "name": {
    "zh": "虚假紧迫感",
    "en": "False Urgency"
  },
  "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/false-urgency/",
  "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/false-urgency.json",
  "alternates": {
    "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/false-urgency.json",
    "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/false-urgency.json"
  },
  "site": {
    "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0",
    "entries": 158,
    "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/index.json",
    "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=zh",
    "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/agents/",
    "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt"
  },
  "provenance": {
    "sourceBacked": [
      "entry.definition"
    ],
    "editorial": [
      "entry.boundary",
      "entry.signature",
      "entry.when",
      "entry.when_not",
      "entry.tradeoff",
      "entry.comparison",
      "entry.rules",
      "entry.relations",
      "entry.implementationNote",
      "entry.anti"
    ],
    "scope": "定义参考以上来源；数字界面示例、选择建议、条件关系及配方由本样例编辑，尚未经用户研究验证。",
    "editorialStatus": "drafted",
    "specimenData": "fictional",
    "specimenNote": "示例为原创虚构界面；定义附来源，用法与配方为编辑建议。",
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "deceptive-fake-urgency",
        "url": "https://www.deceptive.design/types/fake-urgency",
        "title": "Deceptive Patterns · Fake urgency",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "status": "available",
          "confirmed": true,
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915184347/https://deceptive.design/types/fake-urgency/",
          "capturedAt": "2026-09-15T18:43:47Z",
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://www.deceptive.design/types/fake-urgency"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "ftc-dark-patterns-report-2022",
        "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/09/ftc-report-shows-rise-sophisticated-dark-patterns-designed-trick-trap-consumers",
        "title": "FTC · FTC Report Shows Rise in Sophisticated Dark Patterns Designed to Trick and Trap Consumers (2022-09-15)",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "status": "available",
          "confirmed": true,
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260913014016/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/09/ftc-report-shows-rise-sophisticated-dark-patterns-designed-trick-trap-consumers",
          "capturedAt": "2026-09-13T01:40:16Z",
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/09/ftc-report-shows-rise-sophisticated-dark-patterns-designed-trick-trap-consumers"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "mathur-dark-patterns-2019",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07032",
        "title": "Mathur et al. · Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites (2019)",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "status": "available",
          "confirmed": true,
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915183840/https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07032",
          "capturedAt": "2026-09-15T18:38:40Z",
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07032"
        }
      }
    ],
    "lists": [
      {
        "id": "A-C",
        "edition": "classic",
        "seat": 6,
        "origin": "issue-1-ledger",
        "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/A-C/",
        "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/A-C.json"
      },
      {
        "id": "A-Y",
        "edition": "2026-focus",
        "seat": 8,
        "origin": "issue-1-ledger",
        "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/A-Y/",
        "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/A-Y.json"
      }
    ],
    "ordered": false,
    "listDisclaimer": "席位号是编辑位置，不是评分、排名或人气统计；清单未收满时保持原样，不补足。"
  },
  "entry": {
    "id": "false-urgency",
    "type": "anti",
    "name": {
      "zh": "虚假紧迫感",
      "en": "False Urgency"
    },
    "aliases": [
      "虚假倒计时",
      "Fake Urgency",
      "Fake Countdown Timer"
    ],
    "granularity": "component",
    "intents": [
      "audit-choice",
      "audit-pricing"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "反模式",
      "倒计时",
      "限时",
      "施压",
      "结算"
    ],
    "definition": "向用户呈现并不真实存在的时间限制（例如到零即重置的倒计时、没有明确截止时间的“优惠即将结束”），迫使其在压力下仓促完成动作。",
    "boundary": "与羞辱式拒绝文案不同：本条的机制是伪造时间压力，而不是用情绪贬低影响选择。与“虚假稀缺”（伪造有限数量，如假的“仅剩 2 件”）是相邻概念，本词表暂未单独收录，审查时可一并留意但应分别记录。真实且准确说明的截止时间——有具体日期、时间，到期后确实结束——不属于本反模式。",
    "signature": [
      "倒计时归零后自动重置，或每次刷新页面都重新开始",
      "“限时优惠”“即将结束”等文案没有可核实的截止日期或时间",
      "同一“限时”优惠在不同日期访问时始终存在"
    ],
    "when": [
      "审查结算页、购物车与促销横幅中的倒计时组件",
      "审查营销邮件、弹窗和定价页中的“限时”“仅剩”类文案",
      "审查预订、订票类流程中的“座位保留倒计时”是否对应真实释放逻辑"
    ],
    "when_not": [
      "作为提高转化率或缩短决策时间的推荐手段",
      "以“制造氛围”为由放置不对应任何真实截止时间的计时器"
    ],
    "tradeoff": "修复时保留真实的时间信息：若确有截止，用可核实的日期与时间写明，到期后如实下线；若没有截止，就删除计时器与紧迫文案。真实的库存保留倒计时可以使用，但归零后应产生真实后果并说明。",
    "comparison": {
      "focus": "时间压力是否真实存在",
      "mechanism": "伪造或夸大截止时间与倒计时",
      "cost": "用户在人为焦虑下减少审慎评估，做出本不会做的购买或授权"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "deceptive-fake-urgency",
        "title": "Deceptive Patterns · Fake urgency",
        "url": "https://www.deceptive.design/types/fake-urgency",
        "claim": "将虚假紧迫感定义为用虚假的时间限制施压用户完成动作，并列出倒计时器与限时信息两种具体手法，其示例中的倒计时归零后会自动重置。",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://www.deceptive.design/types/fake-urgency",
          "status": "available",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-22T14:49:02.936Z",
          "jobId": "spn2-617e1dbef3358302b7f1321896bb002e8d58f37a",
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915184347/https://deceptive.design/types/fake-urgency/",
          "timestamp": "20260915184347"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "ftc-dark-patterns-report-2022",
        "title": "FTC · FTC Report Shows Rise in Sophisticated Dark Patterns Designed to Trick and Trap Consumers (2022-09-15)",
        "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/09/ftc-report-shows-rise-sophisticated-dark-patterns-designed-trick-trap-consumers",
        "claim": "介绍《Bringing Dark Patterns to Light》报告的新闻稿，把“让消费者误以为购买时间有限、而优惠实际并无时限的倒计时器”列为报告描述的手法之一；本条仅引用其表述，不据此推断具体案例的合法性。",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/09/ftc-report-shows-rise-sophisticated-dark-patterns-designed-trick-trap-consumers",
          "status": "available",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-23T12:16:21.462Z",
          "jobId": "spn2-05a8a5c13cf4cd6a9d83b45281d0f21e7ddc228f",
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260913014016/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/09/ftc-report-shows-rise-sophisticated-dark-patterns-designed-trick-trap-consumers",
          "timestamp": "20260913014016"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "mathur-dark-patterns-2019",
        "title": "Mathur et al. · Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites (2019)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07032",
        "claim": "2019 年对约 1.1 万个购物网站的爬取研究在 1,818 个欺骗模式实例中划分出 15 种类型、7 个类别，其中“Urgency”类别包含倒计时器（393 例、361 个网站）与限时信息（88 例、84 个网站）两种类型；该数据为 2019 年抽样下限，不代表当前普及率。",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-15",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915*/https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07032",
          "status": "available",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-22T15:14:25.073Z",
          "jobId": "spn2-e5ed4643b974bae44d820f9d23f4bc9a1ab499a6",
          "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260915183840/https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07032",
          "timestamp": "20260915183840"
        }
      }
    ],
    "relations": [
      {
        "target": "confirmshaming",
        "kind": "related",
        "condition": "审查选择是否在无压力下作出",
        "reason": "两者都干扰自主选择，但一个伪造时间压力，一个施加情绪压力，应分别检查。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "hidden-costs",
        "kind": "related",
        "condition": "审查结算与定价页面",
        "reason": "倒计时常与后置费用同时出现在结算流程中，机制不同，分别记录。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "obstruction",
        "kind": "composes_with",
        "condition": "退出或取消路径上叠加“仅剩几分钟”类提示",
        "reason": "虚假紧迫感常作为阻碍流程中的附加压力出现，两条问题应各自登记。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "error-prevention",
        "kind": "conflicts_when",
        "condition": "计时器促使用户跳过核对信息的步骤",
        "reason": "人为时间压力会削弱用户在承诺前核对与纠错的机会。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "rules": [
      {
        "when": "在界面中放置倒计时器",
        "instruction": "计时器必须对应真实截止时间，归零后不得重置或重新开始。",
        "strength": "must",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "when": "使用“限时”“即将结束”等紧迫文案",
        "instruction": "文案所指的时限必须可核实，且到期后如实撤下。",
        "strength": "must",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "when": "优惠确实存在截止时间",
        "instruction": "以具体日期和时间（含时区）平实写明，而不是只用模糊的紧迫措辞。",
        "strength": "recommend",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "anti": {
      "harm": "用伪造的时间压力压缩用户的审慎评估空间，诱导本不会作出的购买或授权",
      "repair": "只保留真实、可核实的截止时间并平实写明；没有截止时间时移除计时器与紧迫文案。"
    },
    "demo": null,
    "version": "0.1.0",
    "editorialStatus": "drafted",
    "requirements": [],
    "demoCapabilities": [],
    "implementationNote": "本条尚无可操作的样本；插画为编辑示意。应用到产品时仍须核对：计时器是否与后端真实截止时间绑定、归零和刷新后的行为、紧迫文案在不同日期访问时是否一致，以及所在法域对虚假限时宣传的具体规定。",
    "image": {
      "src": "/images/false-urgency.webp",
      "alt": "一个虚构的 FIELDNOTES 结算卡片：普通价格上方压着一块硕大的红色倒计时方块和一枚闪烁的“抓紧”徽标，角落有一枚细小的警示标记。"
    },
    "searchTerms": [
      "anti-pattern",
      "countdown",
      "limited time",
      "pressure",
      "checkout"
    ]
  }
}