{
  "_description": "本文件由 data/ 生成：请改动来源文件，不要改这里。各字段的证据边界见接入指南。",
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
  "kind": "entry",
  "locale": "zh-CN",
  "id": "modernism",
  "name": {
    "zh": "现代主义设计",
    "en": "Modernism"
  },
  "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/modernism/",
  "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/modernism.json",
  "alternates": {
    "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/modernism.json",
    "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/entries/modernism.json"
  },
  "site": {
    "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0",
    "entries": 137,
    "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/index.json",
    "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=zh",
    "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/agents/",
    "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt"
  },
  "provenance": {
    "sourceBacked": [
      "entry.definition"
    ],
    "editorial": [
      "entry.boundary",
      "entry.signature",
      "entry.when",
      "entry.when_not",
      "entry.tradeoff",
      "entry.comparison",
      "entry.rules",
      "entry.relations",
      "entry.implementationNote",
      "entry.philosophy"
    ],
    "scope": "定义参考以上来源；数字界面示例、选择建议、条件关系及配方由本样例编辑，尚未经用户研究验证。",
    "editorialStatus": "drafted",
    "specimenData": "fictional",
    "specimenNote": "示例为原创虚构界面；定义附来源，用法与配方为编辑建议。",
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "modernism-tate",
        "url": "https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/m/modernism",
        "title": "Tate · Art Term: Modernism",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "status": "pending",
          "confirmed": false,
          "url": null,
          "capturedAt": null,
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/m/modernism"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "modernism-pevsner",
        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolaus_Pevsner",
        "title": "Wikipedia · Nikolaus Pevsner",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "status": "pending",
          "confirmed": false,
          "url": null,
          "capturedAt": null,
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolaus_Pevsner"
        }
      }
    ],
    "lists": [],
    "ordered": false,
    "listDisclaimer": "席位号是编辑位置，不是评分、排名或人气统计；清单未收满时保持原样，不补足。"
  },
  "entry": {
    "id": "modernism",
    "type": "philosophy",
    "name": {
      "zh": "现代主义设计",
      "en": "Modernism"
    },
    "aliases": [
      "Modernist Design",
      "Modern Movement",
      "现代主义",
      "现代运动"
    ],
    "granularity": "experience",
    "intents": [
      "organize-content",
      "reduce-complexity"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "功能",
      "理性",
      "工业化",
      "去装饰",
      "普适"
    ],
    "definition": "一种设计立场：认为形式应当由功能、材料与工业生产方式决定，主张去掉承袭自历史样式的装饰，并相信可以为现代生活找到一套理性的、普遍适用的解决方案。",
    "boundary": "本词条讨论的是一种设计立场与主张，不是某一种视觉风格：包豪斯与瑞士国际主义是它在平面上的具体表现，但现代主义本身包含的是\"为什么这样做\"，而不是\"看起来什么样\"。做出一个干净、几何、无装饰的界面并不等于持有这一立场；反过来，持有这一立场也不必然产出极简的外观。它的\"普遍适用\"主张是这套思想中争议最大的部分：为\"所有人\"设计的方案往往以某一群人为默认，后来的包容性设计、参与式设计与价值敏感设计正是针对这一点提出的修正。本词条不评判这场争论，只把两边都说清楚。",
    "signature": [
      "装饰必须由功能或材料来解释，否则被去掉",
      "方案被表述为普遍适用而非因地制宜",
      "生产方式（工业化、可批量复制）参与决定形式"
    ],
    "when": [
      "产品需要在大量场景中保持一致，个性化的代价高于收益",
      "团队需要一套可被复述的理由来裁决\"要不要加这个元素\"",
      "设计要交付给工程批量实现，而不是逐个手工调整"
    ],
    "when_not": [
      "把\"普遍适用\"当作不必了解具体用户的理由",
      "以\"功能决定形式\"为名去掉对某些用户其实必要的冗余，例如文字标签或多余的提示",
      "把它当成一种外观风格来采用，却不接受它对理由的要求"
    ],
    "tradeoff": "要求每个元素都能被功能解释，使设计有了可讨论、可裁决的依据，也让方案容易被批量实现；代价是这套理性叙述容易把\"我们认为合理\"说成\"普遍合理\"，从而把不在默认设想内的人排除在外。",
    "comparison": {
      "focus": "用功能、材料与生产方式解释每一个形式决定",
      "mechanism": "去掉无法被解释的装饰，追求可批量实现的通用方案",
      "cost": "普遍适用的主张容易把某一群人当作默认"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "modernism-tate",
        "title": "Tate · Art Term: Modernism",
        "url": "https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/m/modernism",
        "claim": "该词条说明现代主义是二十世纪初以来的一场社会与文化运动，试图与现代工业生活的经验和价值重新对齐；文中概括出若干贯穿其中的原则：拒斥历史与保守价值、在形式上创新与实验并趋向抽象、强调材料技法与过程；并指出现代主义常伴随乌托邦式的社会政治诉求与对进步的信念。本词条的立场描述据此转述，把它应用到产品设计的取舍属编辑判断。",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/m/modernism",
          "status": "pending",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-16T17:40:15.595Z",
          "error": "status-request-failed",
          "jobId": "spn2-5d45ffbecb330bb37ff92814271ce7b58047351a"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "modernism-pevsner",
        "title": "Wikipedia · Nikolaus Pevsner",
        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolaus_Pevsner",
        "claim": "该条目记载 Pevsner 的《Pioneers of the Modern Movement》于 1936 年由 Faber & Faber 首次出版，此后多次再版并被译成多种语言，1949 年由现代艺术博物馆出版的第二版改名为《Pioneers of Modern Design》；本词条据此说明\"现代主义设计\"作为一个被书写、被建构的叙述有其明确的出处与时间，而不是自然形成的共识。",
        "checkedAt": "2026-09-16",
        "archive": {
          "lookupUrl": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260916*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolaus_Pevsner",
          "status": "pending",
          "checkedAt": "2026-09-22T12:00:48.473Z",
          "error": "status-request-failed",
          "jobId": "spn2-7d4348e4b78f1d003f7b31d84fa61718266e851b"
        }
      }
    ],
    "relations": [
      {
        "target": "bauhaus",
        "kind": "realized_by",
        "condition": "这一立场需要落到具体的平面视觉语言上",
        "reason": "包豪斯图形语言是现代主义在平面层面的一种具体表现；立场决定理由，风格决定外观，二者不可互相替代。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "swiss",
        "kind": "realized_by",
        "condition": "需要把理性秩序沉淀为可复用的排版规则",
        "reason": "瑞士国际主义把现代主义的理性主张系统化为网格与中性字体的具体规则。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "inclusive-design",
        "kind": "conflicts_when",
        "condition": "\"为所有人设计\"被当作不必了解具体人群的理由",
        "reason": "普遍适用的主张往往以某一群人为默认；包容性设计正是针对这一默认提出的修正。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "target": "participatory-design",
        "kind": "alternative",
        "condition": "决定由谁来判断什么是合理的设计",
        "reason": "现代主义把判断交给受过训练的设计者与可复述的理性依据，参与式设计把判断交给将要使用它的人。",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "rules": [
      {
        "when": "以\"功能决定形式\"为由移除某个元素",
        "instruction": "先确认它对哪些用户承担着功能——文字标签、冗余提示与可见边界常常正是某些人依赖的功能。",
        "strength": "must",
        "basis": "editorial"
      },
      {
        "when": "把某个方案表述为普遍适用",
        "instruction": "写明它是在哪些人、哪些情境下被验证的，把\"普遍\"降级为有范围的主张。",
        "strength": "recommend",
        "basis": "editorial"
      }
    ],
    "philosophy": {
      "values": [
        "形式应当可以被理由解释",
        "设计服务于现代生产与日常生活"
      ],
      "tension": "理性的普遍方案与真实人群的差异之间",
      "questions": [
        "这个元素承担什么功能？对谁承担？",
        "我们说的\"所有人\"，默认的是谁？",
        "去掉它之后，谁会失去他们原本依赖的东西？"
      ]
    },
    "demo": null,
    "version": "0.1.0",
    "editorialStatus": "drafted",
    "requirements": [],
    "demoCapabilities": [],
    "implementationNote": "本词条尚无可操作示例；插画为编辑示意，用\"每个元素都连到一条理由\"的方式表现这一立场，不代表任何历史作品。应用到产品前仍须确认被去掉的元素不是某些用户依赖的功能。",
    "image": {
      "src": "/images/modernism.webp",
      "alt": "一张示意图：左侧是一件布满繁复装饰边框的虚构版面，右侧是同一版面被简化后的样子——只剩几何色块、无衬线标题条与规整栅格，每个保留下来的元素都用细线连到右边一行灰色占位说明条。"
    },
    "searchTerms": [
      "function",
      "rationality",
      "industrial production",
      "ornament removed",
      "universal"
    ]
  }
}