{ "_description": "本文件由 data/ 生成：请改动来源文件，不要改这里。各字段的证据边界见接入指南。", "schemaVersion": "1.0.0", "kind": "list", "locale": "zh-CN", "id": "V-C", "name": { "zh": "视觉风格 · 经典基础", "en": "Visual styles · Classic foundation" }, "headline": { "zh": "视觉风格 Top 10：10 大经典设计风格详解", "en": "Top 10 Classic Visual Design Styles, Explained" }, "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/V-C/", "self": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/V-C.json", "alternates": { "zh-CN": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/V-C.json", "en": "https://designvocabulary.com/en/lists/V-C.json" }, "site": { "catalogSchemaVersion": "0.1.0", "entries": 137, "index": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/index.json", "query": "https://designvocabulary.com/api/query?lang=zh", "guide": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/agents/", "llms": "https://designvocabulary.com/llms.txt" }, "provenance": { "selection": "editorial", "ordered": false, "disclaimer": "席位号是编辑位置，不是评分、排名或人气统计；清单未收满时保持原样，不补足。", "titleNote": "标题中的“Top”与“N 大”是检索用语：本版是编辑选择，不是排名、评分或人气统计。", "seatOrigins": { "issue-1-ledger": "席位来自计划 issue #1 的清单账本。", "editorial-reconstruction": "席位由本仓库编辑判断补上。" }, "evidence": "入选理由是编辑判断：它说明这条词汇在这一类里补上了哪一块，不声称它比别的风格更受欢迎或更有效。每条词条自己的定义另有来源。", "nominalSize": 10, "seatCount": 10, "filled": true, "sibling": { "id": "V-Y", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/V-Y/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/lists/V-Y.json" } }, "seats": [ { "seat": 1, "entry": "swiss", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "给这一类立一个“秩序从哪里来”的参照点：先有网格和层级，装饰才是后话。", "name": "瑞士国际主义", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/swiss/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/swiss.json" }, { "seat": 2, "entry": "neo-brutalism", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "补上与秩序相反的一端：不靠精修而靠直白的描边与色块取得注意力。", "name": "新粗野主义", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/neo-brutalism/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/neo-brutalism.json" }, { "seat": 3, "entry": "bauhaus", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上“几何与原色本身承担表达”的一支，说明去装饰不等于去表现。", "name": "包豪斯视觉语言", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/bauhaus/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/bauhaus.json" }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "art-deco", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "代表把装饰当作正当表达手段的一路，与同类里的削减取向形成对照。", "name": "装饰艺术", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/art-deco/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/art-deco.json" }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "art-nouveau", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上装饰与结构融为一体的做法，区别于把纹样当作附加层的用法。", "name": "新艺术风格", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/art-nouveau/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/art-nouveau.json" }, { "seat": 6, "entry": "minimalism", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "界定“削减”这一取向本身，避免它被当成任何一种具体历史风格的同义词。", "name": "极简视觉风格", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/minimalism/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/minimalism.json" }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "flat-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "把“去掉模拟三维”的具体做法与更宽泛的极简取向分开。", "name": "扁平化设计", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/flat-design/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/flat-design.json" }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "skeuomorphism", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "提供与扁平化相对的一极，说明模仿实物是一种解释手段而非单纯装饰。", "name": "拟物化设计", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/skeuomorphism/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/skeuomorphism.json" }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "memphis", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上刻意违反“好品味”约束的一支，与同类里追求秩序的做法构成对照。", "name": "孟菲斯风格", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/memphis/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/memphis.json" }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "collage", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上“保留可见接缝的多源拼合”，区别于把素材融成连续画面的处理。", "name": "拼贴风格", "type": "visual", "page": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/collage/", "json": "https://designvocabulary.com/zh/entries/collage.json" } ], "list": { "id": "V-C", "category": "visual", "edition": "classic", "name": { "zh": "视觉风格 · 经典基础", "en": "Visual styles · Classic foundation" }, "headline": { "zh": "视觉风格 Top 10：10 大经典设计风格详解", "en": "Top 10 Classic Visual Design Styles, Explained" }, "note": "视觉风格的经典基础：帮助分辨常被混用的视觉语言，不代表使用量或流行程度。", "keywords": [ "视觉风格", "设计风格", "平面设计风格", "包豪斯", "极简主义", "扁平化设计", "拟物化", "设计词汇" ], "lead": "这一版收录的是已经被反复命名、反复引用的视觉语言。它们的价值不在于谁更现代，而在于当你说“这个看起来像包豪斯”时，对方能确切知道你指的是什么。", "criteria": [ "有可核实的来源能说明这套视觉语言的由来与核心特征，而不是只在设计博客里流传的标签。", "能与同类里其他风格划出清楚的边界，不会退化成“好看”“干净”这类无法讨论的说法。", "在今天的数字界面里仍然会被有意识地选用，而不只是历史陈列。" ], "pairing": "与《视觉风格 · 2026 关注》相比，这一版偏向已经稳定下来的命名；两版重合的条目说明它既有历史地位，也仍在被讨论。", "evidence": "入选理由是编辑判断：它说明这条词汇在这一类里补上了哪一块，不声称它比别的风格更受欢迎或更有效。每条词条自己的定义另有来源。", "seats": [ { "seat": 1, "entry": "swiss", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "给这一类立一个“秩序从哪里来”的参照点：先有网格和层级，装饰才是后话。" }, { "seat": 2, "entry": "neo-brutalism", "origin": "editorial-reconstruction", "reason": "补上与秩序相反的一端：不靠精修而靠直白的描边与色块取得注意力。" }, { "seat": 3, "entry": "bauhaus", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上“几何与原色本身承担表达”的一支，说明去装饰不等于去表现。" }, { "seat": 4, "entry": "art-deco", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "代表把装饰当作正当表达手段的一路，与同类里的削减取向形成对照。" }, { "seat": 5, "entry": "art-nouveau", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上装饰与结构融为一体的做法，区别于把纹样当作附加层的用法。" }, { "seat": 6, "entry": "minimalism", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "界定“削减”这一取向本身，避免它被当成任何一种具体历史风格的同义词。" }, { "seat": 7, "entry": "flat-design", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "把“去掉模拟三维”的具体做法与更宽泛的极简取向分开。" }, { "seat": 8, "entry": "skeuomorphism", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "提供与扁平化相对的一极，说明模仿实物是一种解释手段而非单纯装饰。" }, { "seat": 9, "entry": "memphis", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上刻意违反“好品味”约束的一支，与同类里追求秩序的做法构成对照。" }, { "seat": 10, "entry": "collage", "origin": "issue-1-ledger", "reason": "补上“保留可见接缝的多源拼合”，区别于把素材融成连续画面的处理。" } ] } }